Difference between revisions of "A Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America"
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
===Bad=== | ===Bad=== | ||
− | * The descriptions seem to only focus on the more interesting facts and are far from exhaustive. Sometimes they describe how the animal winters, sometimes not; sometimes they talk about reproduction, sometimes not. No doubt, it's a matter of space constraints, but I would gladly accept a smaller | + | * The descriptions seem to only focus on the more interesting facts and are far from exhaustive. Sometimes they describe how the animal winters, sometimes not; sometimes they talk about reproduction, sometimes not. No doubt, it's a matter of space constraints, but I would gladly accept a smaller type size for more information. |
* With fewer than 180 animals and a range of the entire continent, it's not very useful for the average hiker or explorer, but more of a home reference book. It would have been nice to see a book for each region or state. | * With fewer than 180 animals and a range of the entire continent, it's not very useful for the average hiker or explorer, but more of a home reference book. It would have been nice to see a book for each region or state. | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Covers== | ==Covers== | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
− | Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A - Paperback - USA - 1st Edition.jpg|The original cover focuses on three animal types, mammals, invertebrates, and birds. It's a bit dull for my taste, especially with the canary backdrop. | + | Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A - Paperback - USA - 1st Edition.jpg|The original cover focuses on three animal types, mammals, invertebrates, and birds. It's a bit dull for my taste, especially with the canary colored backdrop. |
Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A - Flexibound - USA.jpg|The flexibound spotlights the fox, but also has three foreground photos, all mammals. It doesn't do as good a job showing the span of the animals in the book, but it looks more professional. | Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A - Flexibound - USA.jpg|The flexibound spotlights the fox, but also has three foreground photos, all mammals. It doesn't do as good a job showing the span of the animals in the book, but it looks more professional. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
[[Category: Books|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | [[Category: Books|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | ||
[[Category: Non-Fiction|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | [[Category: Non-Fiction|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | ||
+ | [[Category: Field Guides|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | ||
+ | [[Category: Biology|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | ||
[[Category: Zoology|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | [[Category: Zoology|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | ||
[[Category: Books I've Read|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] | [[Category: Books I've Read|Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America, A]] |
Revision as of 14:27, 21 March 2019
A Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America is a field guide of North American wildlife with a brief description and large full-color photograph of over 170 animals. It was written by Bryan Richard and published in 2006.
I bought this book, not just because it was on clearance and quite cheap, but also because of the beautiful photographs of each animal. I had leafed though it for years, but finally read it through cover-to-cover and finished on 2017-11-07.
Status
I own the flexibound version and have read it.
Review
Good
- Over all, the book is pretty great. It's a good read and fun just to flip through.
- The large photos of each animal are very useful and much better than a long description found in many less-visual guides.
- The descriptions are full of interesting trivia for each animal.
- The side notes include size and ways to distinguish the animal from similar looking species.
- The binomial nomenclature is included for each animal.
Bad
- The descriptions seem to only focus on the more interesting facts and are far from exhaustive. Sometimes they describe how the animal winters, sometimes not; sometimes they talk about reproduction, sometimes not. No doubt, it's a matter of space constraints, but I would gladly accept a smaller type size for more information.
- With fewer than 180 animals and a range of the entire continent, it's not very useful for the average hiker or explorer, but more of a home reference book. It would have been nice to see a book for each region or state.
Ugly
- Nothing.