Difference between revisions of "Epistle to the Galatians"

From TheAlmightyGuru
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 37: Line 37:
[[Category: Books|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Books|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Ancient Writing|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Ancient Writing|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Media Theme - Religion|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Religion|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Religion|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Christianity|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Christianity|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Books I've Read|Galatians, Epistle to the]]
[[Category: Books I've Read|Galatians, Epistle to the]]

Revision as of 17:30, 11 November 2019

Fragment of the Epistle to the Galatians, circa 400 CE.

The Epistle to the Galatians, often identified simply as Galatians, is the ninth book of the New Testament. The text is a letter written by Paul the Apostle in ancient Greek around 40-60 CE and is addressed to churches in the region of Galatia (modern Turkey). In it, Paul condemns those who follow Mosaic Law, especially circumcision, and tells people to stop being evil and be good.

Authorship and Dating

Unlike most of the books of the New Testament, the majority of historians agree that this letter is a genuine product of Paul, and while they're unable to pinpoint a date, suggest authorship between 40-60 CE.


The author of the letter condemns those who still keep with the Mosaic Law, especially circumcision, and tells the readers that all people who believe in Jesus through faith, regardless of their social rank, are one. I can only imagine how much of a culture shock this was to traditional Jews. This letter also includes the Fruit of the Spirit.


I own several translations of this book from various bibles, and have read the NIV translation.



  • In general, I find the letter to be an improvement over the message of the Old Testament, but still lacking depth.


  • Paul spends a lot of time talking about circumcision and how it's not necessary to be a follower of Jesus. I certainly see the elimination of a mutilation ritual as a step in the right direction, but it contradicts the earlier message of the god of the Torah where he explains, many times, that circumcision of all men will be a covenant that lasts forever (Genesis 17:10-14). Paul even goes so far as to say that circumcision will prevent Christ from having value to you (5:2) which starkly contrasts the Torah.
  • In the letter, Paul explains that the Old Mosaic Law no longer applies to followers of Jesus because the sacrifice of Jesus nullified the contract (3:10-14). Again, I see this as an improvement, but it contradicts pretty much all of the old testament. The Torah explains that the Mosaic Law would last forever, and even though there was prophecy of the Messiah coming, no prophecy even hints at changing those laws.
  • Paul contrasts between what he describes as sins of the flesh from the fruit of the spirit. In the sins of the flesh category he includes sexual immorality, impurity, debauchery, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, discord, jealousy, rage, selfishness, dissension, factions, envy, intoxication, and orgies, while in the fruit of the spirit category he includes love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control (5:19-23). However, many of the things listed are ambiguous or axiomatic, and sometimes both. For example, in the list of good things, Paul includes "goodness." Well, sure, something that is good is good, but that doesn't teach the reader anything new. Likewise, from the list of bad things, Paul includes "sexual immorality," but the qualifier "immorality" is defined as, "that which is wrong," which doesn't teach the reader anything because he doesn't specify which sexual acts are moral and which are immoral. Also, by making blanket statements that rage is evil and patience is good, he doesn't tell the reader, who may be dealing with a loathsome person, when it's okay to finally lose your patience and become enraged at them or for how long should you be faithful to a cheat or liar before dissenting. His black and white statements offer no nuance or depth so anyone with a sense of justice more mature than a child's will find them useless.


  • Paul promotes salvation through faith (3:2-5), which I find abhorrent. Telling someone that you'll help them, but only if they believe without doubt that you will, is pathetic. This also contradicts James 2:14-18, 24 which says faith without deeds is useless.


Link-Wikipedia.png  Link-GoodReads.png  Link-ProjectGutenberg.png  link=https://librivox.org/group/360 librivox.org/group/360