Difference between revisions of "Second Epistle of Peter"

From TheAlmightyGuru
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Second Epistle of Peter''', often written simply as, '''II Peter''', is the twenty-second book of the [[New Testament]]. It is a letter written in ancient Greek around 90-120 CE. Although it claims to be written by Peter, there are no professional historians who still argue that it was written by Peter. Ironically, the author tells the reader to be wary of charlatans pretending to followers of Jesus, gives tips on how to identify false teachers, and warns of the impending destruction of the earth.
+
The '''Second Epistle of Peter''', often written simply as, '''II Peter''', is the twenty-second book of the [[New Testament]]. It is a letter written in ancient Greek around 90-120 CE. Although it claims to be written by Peter, there are no professional historians who still argue that it was written by Peter. The author tells the reader to be wary of charlatans pretending to be followers of Jesus (ironic since it's a fraud), gives tips on how to identify false teachers (likewise), and warns of the impending destruction of the earth.
  
 
==Authorship and Dating==
 
==Authorship and Dating==

Revision as of 11:15, 1 March 2019

The Second Epistle of Peter, often written simply as, II Peter, is the twenty-second book of the New Testament. It is a letter written in ancient Greek around 90-120 CE. Although it claims to be written by Peter, there are no professional historians who still argue that it was written by Peter. The author tells the reader to be wary of charlatans pretending to be followers of Jesus (ironic since it's a fraud), gives tips on how to identify false teachers (likewise), and warns of the impending destruction of the earth.

Authorship and Dating

The author identifies himself as Peter the Apostle speaking to other church followers. While church tradition holds that the author is Peter, one of Jesus' 12 disciples, the majority of New Testament scholars are in agreement that Peter did not write the letter. They give several reasons:

  • Peter is described as an uneducated fisherman in the bible meaning he was most likely illiterate, but the letter is expertly written.
  • Peter, being from Galilee, most likely spoke Aramaic or Hebrew, but the letter is written in scholarly Greek.
  • In the Gospels, Peter is described as having been a close friend of Jesus, but this author doesn't mention a single shared event or anecdote of their travels.
  • Historians date Peter's death to 64 or 67 CE, but they date the letter as having been written around 90-120 CE.

In addition to Peter not being the author this epistle, he also probably wasn't the author of the First Epistle of Peter, and, in fact, the letter carries such a different message and style than the first, that many New Testament scholars don't even believe that the two letters were written by the same person.

Content

The author describes what a proper teacher of Jesus should be like, and details the hellfire that awaits any who teach differently. It ends with a reminder that the world will end in horrible destruction.

The letter borrows a lot from the Epistle of Jude, only with the references to the two apocryphal works excised.

One interesting aspect of this epistle is that it is the only book in the New Testament to refer to other writings as "scripture," indicating that it wasn't written until after the religion was canonizing its writings.

Status

I have several translations of this book from various bibles, and have read the NIV translation.

Review

Good

  • Nothing.

Bad

  • One of the common arguments of Christian apologists is that God doesn't send people to Hell, people choose to go to Hell by refusing God's help. However, starting with (2:4) the author clearly explains that God himself sends angels and men alike to hell.

Ugly

  • I found this epistle to be depressing and bigoted. The author revels in his vengeance and joyously awaits the destruction of the world.
  • The author explains that he wasn't following cleverly invented stories about Jesus, but was an eyewitness (1:16). This is especially dishonest once you realize that the author wasn't an eyewitness. This lie is dug deeper in (1:20) where the author says that no prophecy or scripture came about from interpretation or the will of man, but from the words of God carried along by the Holy Ghost. And again in (2:2-3) where the author warns against greedy false teachers who would exploit people's faith for greedy shameful gain, which is most likely what the author is doing. It ends with the author comparing his writing to Paul's in that they speak in the same manner, when, in fact, the author doesn't write the same as in the first epistle (3:15-16)!
  • The author describes people who mock celestial beings as being brutes, beasts, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, and to perish like beasts (2:12).

Links