Difference between revisions of "The Happy Heretic"

From TheAlmightyGuru
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
'''''The Happy Heretic''''' is a non-fiction book written by [[Judith Hayes]] and published on 2000-06-01. It is a collection of writings about the criticism of religion, primarily about Christanity.
 
'''''The Happy Heretic''''' is a non-fiction book written by [[Judith Hayes]] and published on 2000-06-01. It is a collection of writings about the criticism of religion, primarily about Christanity.
  
I bought this book at a CFI convention because I wanted to expand my knowledge of women in the skeptical and atheist movements.
+
==Personal==
 +
I bought this book at a [[CFI]] convention because I wanted to expand my familiarity of women in the atheist movement.
  
 
==Status==
 
==Status==
Line 10: Line 11:
 
==Review==
 
==Review==
 
===Good===
 
===Good===
* Hayes records a lot of the constant hypocrisy around religious preaching piety and being terrible and writes scathing rebukes.
+
* Hayes records a lot of the constant hypocrisy around religious preaching piety and being terrible, and writes scathing rebukes.
  
 
===Bad===
 
===Bad===
 
* I don't care much for the satire articles. Religions have plenty of ridiculous ideas without having to make up new ones.
 
* I don't care much for the satire articles. Religions have plenty of ridiculous ideas without having to make up new ones.
* I don't like how the satire articles are intermixed in with the serious articles without an obvious indication.
+
* I don't like how the satire articles are intermixed in with the serious articles without an obvious indication of when you've begun a satire article.
 
* Hayes often skips over areas where she could go into more detail. For example, in the chapter about morality, though she rightly points out the flaws with the belief that only religious people can have morals, she doesn't go into any depth on where morality actual comes from.
 
* Hayes often skips over areas where she could go into more detail. For example, in the chapter about morality, though she rightly points out the flaws with the belief that only religious people can have morals, she doesn't go into any depth on where morality actual comes from.
  
Line 21: Line 22:
  
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
* [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/835869.The_Happy_Heretic goodreads.com/book/show/835869.The_Happy_Heretic] - Good Reads.
+
{{Link|GoodReads|https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/835869.The_Happy_Heretic}}
  
  
 
[[Category: Books|Happy Heretic, The]]
 
[[Category: Books|Happy Heretic, The]]
[[Category: Non Fiction|Happy Heretic, The]]
+
[[Category: Non-Fiction|Happy Heretic, The]]
 +
[[Category: Media Theme - Atheism|Happy Heretic, The]]
 +
[[Category: Media Theme - Religion|Happy Heretic, The]]
 
[[Category: Atheism|Happy Heretic, The]]
 
[[Category: Atheism|Happy Heretic, The]]
 
[[Category: Religion|Happy Heretic, The]]
 
[[Category: Religion|Happy Heretic, The]]
 
[[Category: Humor|Happy Heretic, The]]
 
[[Category: Humor|Happy Heretic, The]]
 +
[[Category: Books I've Read|Happy Heretic, The]]

Latest revision as of 11:26, 19 February 2020

First edition US hardcover.

The Happy Heretic is a non-fiction book written by Judith Hayes and published on 2000-06-01. It is a collection of writings about the criticism of religion, primarily about Christanity.

Personal

I bought this book at a CFI convention because I wanted to expand my familiarity of women in the atheist movement.

Status

I own a first edition hardcover.

Review

Good

  • Hayes records a lot of the constant hypocrisy around religious preaching piety and being terrible, and writes scathing rebukes.

Bad

  • I don't care much for the satire articles. Religions have plenty of ridiculous ideas without having to make up new ones.
  • I don't like how the satire articles are intermixed in with the serious articles without an obvious indication of when you've begun a satire article.
  • Hayes often skips over areas where she could go into more detail. For example, in the chapter about morality, though she rightly points out the flaws with the belief that only religious people can have morals, she doesn't go into any depth on where morality actual comes from.

Ugly

  • Nothing.

Links

Link-GoodReads.png