Difference between revisions of "The Origin of (Almost) Everything"

From TheAlmightyGuru
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Origin of (Almost) Everything, The - Hardcover - UK - 1st Edition.jpg|thumb|256x256px|UK hardcover, 1st edition.]]
+
{{Book
 +
| Title            = The Origin of (Almost) Everything
 +
| SortTitle        = Origin of (Almost) Everything, The
 +
| Image           = Origin of (Almost) Everything, The - Hardcover - UK - 1st Edition.jpg
 +
| ImageDescription = Hardcover - UK - 1st edition.
 +
| Author          = {{BookAuthor|Graham Lawton}}
 +
| PublishedYear    = 2016
 +
| PublishedMonth  = 10
 +
| PublishedDay    = 25
 +
| Type            = {{BookType|Non-fiction}}
 +
| Genre            = {{BookGenre|Educational}}
 +
| Themes          = {{MediaTheme|History}}, {{MediaTheme|Science}}
 +
| AgeGroup        = Adult
 +
}}
  
'''''The Origin of (almost) Everything''''' is a popular science book by [[Graham Lawton]] and published on 2016-10-25. It gives a brief account of the origin of over 50 different topic, from the universe and atoms, to dogs and penicillin.  
+
'''''The Origin of (Almost) Everything''''' is a popular science book by [[Graham Lawton]] and published on 2016-10-25. It gives a brief account of the origin of over 50 different topic, from the universe and atoms, to dogs and penicillin.  
  
 
==Personal==
 
==Personal==
Always eager to learn more about science, I started listening to this as an audio book. I finished it on 2020-10-16 and enjoyed it.
+
{{BookStatus
 +
| Own      =
 +
| Read    = Audiobook read by [[David Thorpe]].
 +
| Finished = 2020-10-16.
 +
}}
  
==Status==
+
I'm always eager to learn more about science, so I read this book.
I don't own this book, but I've read it.
 
  
 
==Review==
 
==Review==
 +
{{BookRating|7}}
 +
 
===Good===
 
===Good===
 
* As the title suggests, the author describes the origin of a myriad of things, which is interesting, and he does so in an enjoyable manner, which is even more interesting.
 
* As the title suggests, the author describes the origin of a myriad of things, which is interesting, and he does so in an enjoyable manner, which is even more interesting.
Line 15: Line 33:
  
 
===Bad===
 
===Bad===
* Some of the origins don't go into nearly enough depth. For example, in the chapter on the origin of the universe, the author explains that [[quantum mechanics]] teaches us that the universe has a net value of zero, and that "nothing" is unstable, and always breaks into something. This is presented without any evidence or data to back it up.
+
* Some of the origins don't go into nearly enough depth. For example, in the chapter on the origin of the universe, the author explains that [[quantum mechanics]] teaches us that the universe has a net value of zero, and that "nothing" is unstable, and always breaks into something. This is presented without any evidence or data to back it up, or any detailed explanation for what that means.
* There are occasional claims that sound very suspect. For example, in the section on possessions, the author claims that animals don't keep possessions, not because they're not intelligent enough to do so, but because they don't have language. No evidence is given for why, if we were to breed a highly intelligent animal without language, it couldn't possibly keep possessions, or why all animals with language must keep possessions.
+
* There are occasional claims that sound very suspect. For example, in the section on possessions, the author claims that animals don't keep possessions, not because they're not intelligent enough to do so, but because they don't have language. No evidence is given for why, if we were to breed a highly intelligent animal without language, it wouldn't keep possessions, or why all animals with language must therefore keep possessions.
  
 
===Ugly===
 
===Ugly===
Line 32: Line 50:
 
{{Link|GoodReads|https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30762400-new-scientist}}
 
{{Link|GoodReads|https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30762400-new-scientist}}
 
{{Link|Official|https://shop.newscientist.com/collections/books/products/the-origin-of-almost-everything?variant=31289528811617}}
 
{{Link|Official|https://shop.newscientist.com/collections/books/products/the-origin-of-almost-everything?variant=31289528811617}}
 
 
[[Category: Books|Origin of (Almost) Everything, The]]
 
[[Category: Non-Fiction|Origin of (Almost) Everything, The]]
 
[[Category: Media Theme - History|Origin of (Almost) Everything, The]]
 
[[Category: Media Theme - Science|Origin of (Almost) Everything, The]]
 
[[Category: Books I've Read|Origin of (Almost) Everything, The]]
 

Latest revision as of 18:09, 5 March 2023

The Origin of (Almost) Everything

Origin of (Almost) Everything, The - Hardcover - UK - 1st Edition.jpg

Hardcover - UK - 1st edition.

Author Graham Lawton
Published 2016-10-25
Type Non-fiction
Genre Educational
Themes History, Science
Age Group Adult

The Origin of (Almost) Everything is a popular science book by Graham Lawton and published on 2016-10-25. It gives a brief account of the origin of over 50 different topic, from the universe and atoms, to dogs and penicillin.

Personal

Own?No.
Read?Audiobook read by David Thorpe.
Finished2020-10-16.

I'm always eager to learn more about science, so I read this book.

Review

Overall:

Rating-7.svg

Good

  • As the title suggests, the author describes the origin of a myriad of things, which is interesting, and he does so in an enjoyable manner, which is even more interesting.
  • The book dispels several common myths about the history of science and technology. For example, the Wright brothers didn't build the first powered aircraft, and Alexander Fleming, though he discovered it, wasn't responsible for turning penicillin into a useful antibiotic.

Bad

  • Some of the origins don't go into nearly enough depth. For example, in the chapter on the origin of the universe, the author explains that quantum mechanics teaches us that the universe has a net value of zero, and that "nothing" is unstable, and always breaks into something. This is presented without any evidence or data to back it up, or any detailed explanation for what that means.
  • There are occasional claims that sound very suspect. For example, in the section on possessions, the author claims that animals don't keep possessions, not because they're not intelligent enough to do so, but because they don't have language. No evidence is given for why, if we were to breed a highly intelligent animal without language, it wouldn't keep possessions, or why all animals with language must therefore keep possessions.

Ugly

  • Nothing.

Media

Covers

Links

Link-GoodReads.png  link={{{2}}}